• HILITE NEWS HAS BEEN NAMED A NATIONAL SCHOLASTIC PRESS ASSOCIATION ONLINE PACEMAKER FINALIST
  • HILITE NEWS HAS BEEN NAMED THE HOOSIER STAR WINNER FOR NEWS SITE
  • HILITE NEWS HAS BEEN NAMED A COLUMBIA SCHOLASTIC PRESS ASSOCIATION GOLD CROWN WINNER
Your source for CHS news

HiLite

Your source for CHS news

HiLite

Your source for CHS news

HiLite

“Twilight” movie a disappointment to even the most devout fans

By Min Qiao
<[email protected]>

The phenomenon that is Twilight is amazing. As a devout follower of Stephenie Meyer’s series, I can vouch for the incredibly magical, yet believable plot that Meyer has crafted throughout her first three books. The story of Twilight begins when Bella Swan moves to the small town of Forks, WA to live with her father. At school, she is introduced to a clique of kids, the Cullens, who stand in stark contrast from the rest. After a considerable amount of nosing and probing, Bella finds out that they are, in fact, vampires. Throughout all of this, Bella finds herself falling in love with Edward Cullen, one of the vampires. Twilight is a classic tale of girl meets boy with a perfect mix of supernatural and thrill that leaves the reader eager for the sequel.

Unfortunately, the movie version of this story loses something in the translation.  If all the magic and subtleties of Meyer’s work were translated to the movie, then “Twilight” might actually be halfway decent. Of course, like most book-to-movies, all of the elements that made the book such a phenomenon were swept away in a sea of epic background music and dramatic close-up shots. Director Catherine Hardwicke has overdone herself, trying to please the followers of the Twilight religion so much that the average, initiated movie-watcher would be lost in this whirlwind of events in which all the transitions were forsaken for another close-up of Edward and Bella, staring longingly into each other eyes, obviously shot for all those Team Edward fans . The star-crossed romance of Bella and Edward was rushed and chopped up into a couple of hackneyed scenes that looked like a bad job of cutting and pasting from the books with none of that chemistry that Meyer crafted. In fact, the only way the audience would even know that Bella and Edward are an “item” is because Bella’s annoying cop-out of Meredith Grey’s narration quoted the book saying “About three things I was absolutely positive: First, Edward was a vampire. Second,there was a part of him–and I didn’t know how dominant that part might be–that thirsted for my blood. And third, I was unconditionally and irrevocably in love with him.”

Of course, the fact that Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart had absolutely no on-screen chemistry did not help. The light-hearted bantering between Edward and Bella in the books was replaced with an awkwardness that most would cringe at. Perhaps this has something to do with the fact that Pattinson looked pained and constipated in most of his scenes as he delivered his lines through clenched teeth. Yes, I understand that Edward is known for his tortured soul act, but Pattinson’s portrayal of that was definitely sub-par. And while I commend Hardwicke for trying to incorporated some of the humor that made Bella and Edward’s romance believable into the books, it was an utterly dismal attempt especially when combined with Pattinson’s constant state of agony.

As for special effects, let’s just say that it looked a bad episode of “Charmed” and the ashen-faced vampires closely resembled geishas. The one scene that I was looking forward to was the romantic scene in the meadow where Bella gets to see Edward sparkling in the sun for the first time. And they butchered it. Where it was supposed to be romantic, it was violent and clichéd. Where it was supposed to be magical, well, it looked like they decided to dunk Pattinson in a tub of glitter.

The only thing that somewhat salvaged this movie was interactions between Bella and her father. The awkwardness and cluelessness of Charlie came to life in the movie as he struggled to raise a teenage girl in a dangerous town. One of the funniest scenes in the movie was when Bella tells her father that she would be going on a date with Edward. Charlie responds with a couple of skeptical retorts before finally saying “Bring him in” and then snaps his rifle shut.

Despite its best attempts, “Twilight’s” crudely stringed together patches from the book gave no consideration for the crucial transitional details that made this impossible tale such a success for Meyer. This, mixed with the bad acting, lame attempts at humor and a healthy dose of ’80s special effects makes for a third-rate film and leaves the audience resigned to simply staring at the eye candy. Oh, no wait. They butchered that too with Pattinson.

Overall:
D


View Comments (10)
Donate to HiLite
$20
$500
Contributed
Our Goal

Comments (10)

All HiLite Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • B

    BeverlyJul 7, 2010 at 11:34 am

    To be perfectly honest Bella had to be the worst in these movies… I mean seriously… The only acting face she has is “Im going to vomit” go ahead look at her… in every scene thats what she looks like. The rest of the characters (Charlie in particular, maybe Jacob cause at least he was trying) could have been salvaged if she didnt suck at acting so much. Im dreading the next movie where she has to do the whole pregnant and new vampire thing becasue her one look will not be able to pull it off.

    Reply
  • A

    AnaSep 7, 2009 at 8:07 am

    I HATED this movie. I LOVED these books. Although I knew that a movie could never cover all the details of the book, I was hoping that it would cover more than it did. It just seemed that it skipped over so much. And the casting was awful. The Cullins were supposed to be very beautiful, but in my opinion there were not even good looking. Especially the men. The love between Edward and Bella had been barely touched upon in this movie, and for me, that was the whole book, and the whole series. I am not sure if I can watch the second movie out of sheer disappointment for the first.

    Boy, Stepanie Meyer must be really upset!

    Reply
  • F

    faithMay 30, 2009 at 2:00 am

    URGH I GO NUTS ABOUT TWILIGHT SAGA EVERY SINGLE OF THE BOOK I ENJOYED, LOVED, AND READ. sometimes i go to the extent to staying up late at night to finish the book so that i can move on to the next. I cnnt believe the detail of every single thing in the books that u can even imagine as if you were bella in the book. and also about how everyone was feeling.THE BOOK HAD AMAZING DETAILS AND SUSPENSE MIXED WITH ROMANCE. AND URGH. blast it. THE MOVIE WAS A MAJOR DISAPPOINTMENT. i nearly wanna puke. even though robert pattinson was er…. pretty ugly, but with the make up and eyes and…, better hair he made the look of a vampire., quite contented. bella,…….was, LUCKY, to make it in the movie. in the book JACOB was an irritatin character to me. i wanted to just skip jacob and read the romance between edward and bella. edward was a picture of a perfect guy all of us gals would want. The movie was the total opposite:

    IT RUSHED THROUGH ALL THE SCENES, A BLUR, NO DETAILS, NO ROMANCE.
    at least there wasn’t much irritatin jacob in it.
    suddenly they just met, the next moment, bella was “unconditionally and irrevocably in love with him.”
    NO DETAILS. no chemistry, no specificy in the nights edward spent with bella, no meadow, no kiss, no touch, edward in this book had already kissed bella a few times with ALOT of control, but the movie only let them kiss once. no biology with blood or faint. the house didn’t seem big and scary, abit too bright. and the rooms weren’t as big as in the book.

    i’m FUMING. if i continue i’m afraid i’ll have a heart attack, lets just hope the new movie out in november 09 “New moon” would be much better.

    Reply
  • A

    AudreyMay 12, 2009 at 6:38 pm

    Movie HUGE dissapointment!!!!!!

    Reply
  • K

    KiaJan 25, 2009 at 8:56 pm

    I was really angry in at the movie. my and my friend rebecca made a list of about fifty things wrong with the movie. Here area few
    the forest wasnt a forest………it was a cluster of trees
    Edwards bite marks were on the left but in the flashback Carlisle bit him on the right, Esme was bite on the left
    Rosalie wasnt the right kind of mean she was to bitchy
    Jasper look constapated
    Alice was to girly, more punkish would have made her perfect
    When Edward first saw Bella in the class and when he smelt her was all wrong it was to noticable
    He never got out the car when Bella was in the alley
    The small date scene was stupid in that little cafe with that tiny table
    Emmett was a little dense in the head
    Esme wasnt motherly enough
    Carlisle make up was to thick
    Jacobs hair was all wron, should have been straight and in a pony tail

    but im going to stop here cauuse i can go on forever

    Reply
  • V

    VanessaJan 13, 2009 at 12:20 pm

    I didn’t like the cast in the movie at all!!! the only characters that I liked where Charlie, Alice, James and maybe Jacob.. but I absolutely hated Edward and Bella in the movie! they can’t act at all!! all the chemistry was gone in the movie! I felt like they didn’t have feelings! I was so disappointed! I really hope that the new director will make it better… although if they keep the same Edward and Bella which they will, it’s going to be the same =(

    Reply
  • T

    TaylorJan 8, 2009 at 10:33 am

    ok u guys are ridiculous u should be thankful they even made a movie it was awesome and i think its crap tht u gus complain about it if u like the books and this is most definately the next harry potter cus in my oppinion twilight is the best movie and series there is and for robert pattinson hes adorable hes sooo cute even with his new haircut so everybody get over themselves cus twilight is da bomb and no one can change tht.

    Reply
  • C

    ceceDec 27, 2008 at 1:40 am

    Thank You! Someone who shares my sentiments! It was like, saying the things, all the things i was disappointed about this movie. I am such a big fan of the twilight books and despite people saying the movie does not live up to the readers’ expectations, i was curious enough to watch it anyway. i wanted to kill someone when i walked out of that theatre. the optimism and excitement was lost. the magic of the books were lost in the movie….it was awkward. i always thought bella was this sad little 17 year old but at the same time, she’s still a teenager with such a good sense of humor who lovingly adored this vampire. robert pattinson did a good job, just not worth a standing ovation!
    i was just extremely disappointed.

    Reply
  • L

    lukDec 15, 2008 at 12:09 am

    The Movie Was Horrible…

    Intensity, Magnetism, Sensuality, all were taken out…

    The only person who actually resembled any of the main characters, was Alice….

    Rosalie was supposed to be beautiful… what happened….

    Edward was supposed to be handsome… what happened….

    What happened to the fabulous, fierce, red hair, and sensuality of the red headed vamire… what happened… really….

    And Bella run out of hotel not out of the airport… it clearly stated in the book, that Alice could read minds….

    And u saw Jake only in two scenes…. were was the supspence of vampires… the scary parts… the romance, the sensuality, devotion, love, hate, passion….

    Why did she make that movie any way

    Reply
  • R

    RebeccaNov 24, 2008 at 8:26 pm

    I knew this movie would be horrible from the moment Robert Pattinson was cast as Edward.

    Also, although I am a fan of Twilight, it will NEVER be the next Harry Potter in any way, shape or form!

    Reply