• HILITE NEWS HAS BEEN NAMED A NATIONAL SCHOLASTIC PRESS ASSOCIATION ONLINE PACEMAKER FINALIST
  • HILITE NEWS HAS BEEN NAMED THE HOOSIER STAR WINNER FOR NEWS SITE
  • HILITE NEWS HAS BEEN NAMED A COLUMBIA SCHOLASTIC PRESS ASSOCIATION GOLD CROWN WINNER
Your source for CHS news

HiLite

Your source for CHS news

HiLite

Your source for CHS news

HiLite

Synthetic yeast chromosome

Synthetic+yeast+chromosome

[aesop_image img=”https://hilite.org/core/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/DNA.jpg” caption=”NPR.ORG / SOURCE” align=”left” captionposition=”left” lightbox=”off”]Recently, scientists revealed a major breakthrough in the field of synthetic biology – a functional, fully-synthesized chromosome.

The chromosome used for synthesis was one of yeast’s chromosomes, and yeast organisms with the new chromosome are known as the SynIII yeast strain. Scientists were able to get rid of long series of base pairs that didn’t code for anything, and add certain base pairs for desirable traits. What’s more, the yeast was observed to still reproduce.

Yeast strains with partially synthetic genetic material are already being employed in the production of ingredients for anti-malarial drugs, which makes this new discovery very promising for various industries. On a note that may strike closer to home, the fact that yeast is eukaryotic (has membrane-bound structures) means it is far more similar to us than, say, bacteria.

This is interesting because in the past, we’ve only been able to code for simpler organisms (the first prokaryotic genome was synthesized in 2010).  This means we’re closer to the point of synthetic genomes for plants and animals – namely, humans.

Now here’s where things venture into the twilight zone a bit. There’s a lot of debate as to where synthesizing genes should stop. Do we use it in humans? If we did, we’d possibly be able to cure various psychiatric disorders, but many people find the prospect of changing the fabric of our beings highly unsettling.

My personal opinion is that we should not try to balance ourselves or slow the progress of research, because I can say assuredly that the scientific community would use this to do good things in the world. I have no fear of a Huxley-esque future because I simply don’t think people would allow it to become a reality. But of course someone with my empirical worldview has a very high threshold for how much experimentation and research is too much.

So, once more, that’s all for now. Further posts are to be expected after break. For science!

Leave a Comment
Donate to HiLite
$20
$500
Contributed
Our Goal

Comments (0)

All HiLite Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *